The influence of Artificial intelligence (AI) is not unknown in the world today. From the basic AI like Google Assistant to Siri to BIXBY, we have advanced to the era of open AI like chat Gpt, Bard, Claude, and a lot more. The impact of AI in the major sectors of the world goes without a doubt and this also applies to the field of law as it has generated hopes in this sector too.
From the legal point of view, AI has been seen as a way of relieving court congestion, making contract automation easier, and making sentences for particular offenses more consistent and therefore fairer. So, it is safe to point out that, the field where data-driven Al will change and is changing the law most obviously, and most quickly, is in the law enforcement and criminal justice sector.
Now with the rapid changes occurring in the aspect of law, it also raises questions on the ethical implications of AI in law enforcement and judiciary.
Ethical Implications Of Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement
As law enforcement in the world today increasingly adopts AI(Artificial intelligence) for predictive policy and facial recognition, thumbprints, etc. Concerns about biased algorithms come to life because when you think about it, most of these AI systems used are trained on data, and if the data is biased the AI system would also be biased thereby leading to unfair or discriminatory policies.
Now with the claim of making proper investigation, AI systems have been made to collect and analyze vast amounts of personal data about individuals whether criminals or not, and this raises questions about privacy and surveillance. The ethical dilemma goes towards fairness and justice where there is a requirement of guidelines for transparency and accountability in algorithmic decision-making. In this view of things, the balance must be established to ensure that public safety is maintained at levels that will not infringe on the privacy of individual citizens.
Ethics in Judicial Decision-Making
AI tools, especially in predictive analytics, as become the bedrock upon which judicial decision-making is done. While, yes, AI systems have made decision-making easier in different ways not only in the predictive aspects they still bring about questions as to the reliability, the risk factors, and the inaccuracies that are likely to occur from its use.
An example is the use of AI for automated decisions that would originally be made by human judges or juries, concerns would be raised about due process and the right to a fair trial. Assistance in areas of sentencing and evidence evaluations the risk of unfair or discriminatory outcomes from the use of AI also comes to life. Despite their show of promise from efficiency, ethical concerns still arise, therefore ensuring that AI algorithms do not perpetuate the existing biases in the legal system a required balance must exist with a technological advancement of banal justice.
Safeguarding Individual Rights
The main reason AI was integrated into the legal sector is to make justice prevail and safeguard the rights of individuals as this is paramount in this Era. Therefore, legal frameworks must be revisited to ensure that these AI technological advancements are in line with fairness and uphold the constitutional rights of individuals, and make safeguards, if possible, for the already established systems. This should be done to prevent the misuse of AI tools in the judiciary.
Transparency and Accountability
There are issues with transparency and accountability of these AI programs. As it can be difficult to understand how AI systems work, making it difficult to hold them accountable for their decisions. Then questions like Who is responsible for the actions of an AI System? Is it the programmer? The user? Or The system itself?
In conclusion, integrating AI within law enforcement and the judiciary will continue defining future trends, but this must be done with consideration of ethical approaches and human rights. Changes based on ethical responsibility are the only major processes that can ensure the retention of the core justice tenets within a fast-changing technological world.
Category: Law
TAGS: Artificial intelligence, Law enforcement, Judicial system, Evidence gathering, Sentencing, Adversarial right ,Automation
Read more about this here
