In recent years, a concerning trend has emerged in the realm of Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) claims, as rejection rates for final settlements have witnessed a significant upswing. The rejection rate has surged from approximately 13% in 2017-18 to a staggering 34% in 2022-23, raising alarms about the financial well-being of Employees’ Provident Fund subscribers.
Transition to Online Processing: A Double-Edged Sword
The shift towards online processing is identified as a primary catalyst for the surge in rejection rates. EPFO officials point out that the verification of documents for claims, which used to occur primarily at the employers’ end, has now shifted online, with Aadhaar playing a pivotal role. While this transition aimed to streamline processes, it has inadvertently led to complications, contributing to the rejection surge.
Alarming Rejection Rates: Unveiling the Disturbing Figures
Delving into official data for the financial year 2022-23 sheds light on a disconcerting reality. Out of the 73.87 lakh claims submitted for final PF settlement, a staggering 33.8% (24.93 lakh) faced rejection, unveiling the severity of the issue. This rejection rate is significantly higher than rates observed in previous years, such as 13% and 18.2% in 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively. The rejection rate further increased to 35.2% in 2021-22, emphasizing the concerning upward trajectory.
Table of Contents
Root Causes of Rejection
Former members of the Central Board of Trustees (CBT), EPFO, highlight that minor discrepancies, such as a single alphabet mismatch in the name or variations in Aadhaar details, are now major contributors to claim rejections. Employees’ Provident Fund subscribers are grappling with a system that seems less forgiving of minor errors, leading to frustration and financial distress.
Customer Dissatisfaction: Identifying Pain Points
In a Central Board of Trustees meeting held in October 2022, the major causes of customer dissatisfaction were recorded. Non-transfer of PF accumulations, KYC-related issues, non-crediting of amounts post-claim settlement, repeated claim rejections, delays in PF withdrawals, and passbook-related problems emerged as prominent pain points. This suggests a broader systemic issue affecting the overall experience of Employees’ Provident Fund subscribers.
EPFO’s Response: Striving for Improvement
In response to the rising rejection rates, the EPFO emphasizes its commitment to being a customer-centric organization, continuously working to enhance service delivery. The EPFO notes a substantial increase in membership and highlights the doubling of claim filings to 5.77 crores. It underscores that about 99% of claims are settled within the statutory time limit, with a significant reduction in the return rate of ineligible claims. However, critics argue that these statistics do not address the core issues causing rejections.
Addressing a Tragic Incident: Suicide at EPFO Premises
The distressing incident of a member dying by suicide at the EPFO premises in Kerala adds a somber dimension to the discussion. The EPFO has initiated an administrative inquiry, acknowledging the gravity of the situation. This incident underscores the real-world consequences of claim rejections and the pressing need for the EPFO to prioritize a more empathetic and responsive approach.
Calls for Reform: Correcting the Course
Former CBT members stress the urgent need for a system to promptly correct mistakes, especially considering the rise in rejections due to seemingly trivial errors. A more flexible approach, they argue, could prevent unnecessary distress for Employees’ Provident Fund subscribers. The EPFO’s commitment to customer-centricity should translate into tangible measures to reduce rejection rates, offering financial security to its over 29 crore subscribers.
Conclusion: Charting a Path Forward
As rejection rates for EPF final settlement claims continue to rise, stakeholders emphasize the critical importance of reassessing the online processing system. A user-friendly interface, clearer guidelines, and a more responsive approach to rectifying discrepancies are essential. The EPFO’s commitment to customer-centricity should be reflected in concrete measures to reduce rejection rates, ensuring the financial security of millions of EPF subscribers. The tragic incident in Kerala serves as a poignant reminder that behind these statistics are real lives, urging swift and meaningful reforms in the EPFO’s claims processing system.
